"A quarter of Sydney people now live in what is virtually a fourth tier of government, as strata dwellings set laws and impose taxes on residents."
A more flexible approach and less red tape needed in NSW strata laws review
Page 1 of 2
Since December 2011 a review of strata and community scheme law in NSW has been underway, and comments and submissions closed last week.
In 1961 it was NSW that enacted the world’s first strata title laws with the introduction of the Conveyancing (Strata Title) Act. In 1973 there was a major upgrade to the laws, and the Strata Titles Act was introduced.
When the current review was first announced more than 1,200 comments and some 600 suggested changes to current laws were received. NSW Fair Trading has issued a strata and community title law reform discussion paper, which highlights some of the key concerns the review is expected to address.
Some of the key points noted in the discussion paper are of vital interest to the ongoing development of the entire range of projects we are all involved with, and they cover a wide gambit of topics.
One of the key points is that the current legislation is a "one size fits all" approach, which experience demonstrates is a rigid and unrealistic approach given the variation is the size of projects. Clearly a small scheme of six apartments or homes is very different from a high rise that contains 100 or more apartments.
Red tape is another area the review may well address, as the discussion points out the original 29 provisions of the original law has now grown to more than 1,500 provisions covering 926 pages.
A need for a more flexible approach
It is interesting then to note that the discussion paper is also suggesting that greater flexibility is required for individual schemes.
Examples given in the discussion paper include pointing to the mandating of a particular colour scheme for outdoor furniture and the banning of Christmas decorations and flags.
Somewhat allied to this point is the very real need to balance personal freedoms and co-operative duties, because as we will all understand the move from a private freestanding home into a strata building or community projects is for many people a major lifestyle change.
This then leads onto the very real question of how so many competing interests in a scheme are best managed. Just think about the varied stakeholders that an owners corporation has to interact with – developers, owner-occupiers, strata managers, letting agents, tenants, selling agents, investors – are just a few.
And just like the red tape issues outlined there is clearly more room to use simple plain English in the new legislation.
Beyond these issues other major topics covered in the discussion paper cover governance and participation, these areas are very important, as there appears to be some reluctance for many owners to be involved with management of their owners' corporation.
One way to improve participation is the discussion paper notes a more deliberate focus on communications, which would for instance accommodate "virtual meetings" using Skype and teleconferencing. As technology moves this sounds like a logical and helpful idea.
In NSW 60% of schemes are managed by licensed managing agents and almost 100% of large schemes are managed by agents, making transparency and accountability key issues.