AUSTRALIA'S HOUSING PRICE BUBBLE DEBATE |
Ten fundamental reasons why prices won’t crash in 2012: Academic Phillip Dare
By
Larry Schlesinger
As we look to what's ahead for 2012, Property Observer is republishing some of our most noteworthy stories of 2011.
The hotly debated question of whether Australian house prices are too high and must inevitably come crashing down to earth has been answered by Deakin University’s Phillip Dare, who says there are 10 fundamental reasons why the property market is safe from a crash. Writing for The Conversation academic blog, Dare, lecturer in property and real estate at Deakin University’s school of management and marketing, says the question is “not whether Australia has a housing price bubble, but what fundamentals are in place that might sustain our housing prices”. Dare notes in particurlar the most extreme predictions of a 60% crash in property prices by US academic Harry Dent labelling it a “gross exaggeration”. According to Dare, the 10 reasons why the Australian property market is not destined to crash are: 1. We’re big and isolated “Australia is a big country, without shared borders with neighbouring economic powerhouses – or economic basket cases that might impact our population bases or locational living choices.” 2. Australians stay put and in major urban areas Whereas in Europe, workers can cross borders easily to seek work in other capital cities, reducing the demand for property in urban areas in their home countries, “[Australia’s] population flows remain largely static… We basically follow jobs, usually Victoria to Queensland and back in the other direction. We are similar in area to continental Europe and the United States, but with a population barely 10% of those geopolitical entities. The majority of Australians live within the major urban hubs of each state, with most living along the eastern seaboard.” 3. Our economy is strong is relative to the those of US and Europe “Contrary to the economic woes being experienced by Europe and even the US, our economy is chugging along nicely, keeping us out of recession with a tight fiscal regime, low public debt and a central bank with a flexible monetary policy that concentrates on taming inflation and achieving low rates of unemployment. So it could be argued that compared to markets such as the UK, US and Ireland where prices have been in free-fall, Australian property prices may well look as if being overpriced simply because they have not receded in such precipitous levels,” says Dare. 4. Our banking system is strong and well regulated “[Price] falls are inextricably linked to the catastrophic failures in the North Atlantic and European banking systems, while Australia has a robust banking system with strong prudential regulation. Thanks to this, we have not been burdened with a US-style sub-prime property disaster which figured so prominently in the 2008 global financial crisis,” Dare says. 5. A tax system that favours investors and owner-occupiers According to Dare, among favourable tax rules in place for property investors are negative gearing concessions that allow interest payments to be written off against personal income and a 50% reduction in capital gains tax on property kept for at least one year. For owner-occupiers, profit earned on the sale of their principal place of residence are not taxed while the abolition of death duties decades ago means that “significant amounts of [property] value are transferred inter-generationally without attracting any tax”. 6. We are not building enough houses Dare says stock levels are falling – though the likes of Michael Matusik would disagree. “Not enough new housing stock is being built to sate demand (such as new household formations and immigration),” Dare says. In addition, due to land banking, there has been a controlled release of development land. “Major builders and developers have bought large tracts of development land and [are] holding for controlled release.” 7. Election strategies support house prices Dare says political parties have supporting housing values as part of their election strategies with policy promises such as the first-home owner scheme. “Propping up house prices was strategically used by previous governments for electoral purposes.” 8. Easier for investors buy real estate According to Dare, changes in foreign investment rules have sustained prices in some areas. In 2008 the Foreign Investment Review Board dropped its requirement that only 50% of new dwellings could be sold to foreign persons in an off-the-plan transaction. 9. Continual spruiking of property “[There] is regular spruiking in the daily newspapers of get-rich fast with property seminars/schemes,” says Dare. 10. It’s easier to borrow money Dare notes the weakening of loan-to-valuation ratios from 80% to 95% and 100%. “Banking deregulation has seen housing finance freed from the shackles and once onerous (and at times ridiculous) lending guidelines,” he says. |
|


















Leave a Comment
written by King James1, December 24, 2011
written by Nick-Mulgrave, December 26, 2011
What a fool Dare is for beleiving that we would believe this non-sense. On just about all 10 points he is wrong - and time again will prove it.
Point 1 - Big and isolated - hasnt stopped crashes before (unless offcouse we have only recently in the last 10 years become "big and isolated".
Point 2 - Its all relative. Nothing to do with migration to such an extent of house price rises across the board to such an extent
Point 3 - This is like saying as a smoker and given the risk I am taking in smoking, I am blessed when I compare myself with a lung cancer sufferer. If I continue smoking I will get lung cancer or a fatal disease. Same with Australia compared to US/Europe. We borrowed to the hilt, we WILL suffer the same consequences - Which is now showing
Point 5 - Property investing is a mugs game. Not like it used to be before banking was de-regulated. Factoring in inflation, return is negative which is offset by tax concessions. The kicker is that now that house prices are falling any capital gain that would've made up for the annual losses is non-existant and a final investment loss will be realised upon sale. BRILLIANT Mr Dale.
Point 6 - The statitstics regarding this are massaged to give the impression of shortage such as roudning up, including homeless people and peopel living in caravans. If we look at water usages per property we see an entirely different picture (the opposite)
Point 7 - FHOG are only favour the vendor as prices rise in accordance with the grant upon announcement. Only to increase the stamp duty for state governments.
point 8 - Yes new money was needed to prop up the ponzi scheme. Upon community uproar, the rules where again changed, and a new scheme was needed to keep the Ponzi scheme going 0- Superannuation was now allowed to borrow against any "investment" in property.
Point 9 - Yes you wonder what vested interest these spruikers have Mr Dale.
Point 10 - "Onerrous and ridiculous" - makes you wonder then why the banks didnt hold these loans but rather sold them to "investors" if the system was improved.
Mr Dale why dont you do as you say then and go buy a couple "investment" properties just to prove to us your point.
Your academic credentials are a joke.
written by James West, December 26, 2011
1) We’re big and isolated..... This little factoid is one of the most absurdly meaningless pieces of hand waving I've ever had the pleasure of reading. Dare mightn't be much of an analyst, but he might have a future in stand up comedy, doing imitations of used car salesmen. RE agents, politicians etc.
2) The only numbers Australians stay put and in major urban areas..... No numbers are provided which give us any idea of how our population movements compare with those of the EU, while his one attempt at using numbers shows just how totally anumeric he is. Phil, the US has over 300 million people, while the EU over 500 million. AUstralia has around 23million. "Barely 10%" would mean we had a population of at least 30-50 million.
3) Our economy is strong..... You seem to be confusing reasons why the bubble hasn't collapsed i.e. past tense, with reasons why it won't collapse (future tense). This is kind of like extrapolating from the fact that you are in rude good health today, to reach the conclusion that you must therefore be immortal.
I could go on, point by point, as they don't get any better, but why bother. Really, you must try harder.
written by Property Sceptic, December 27, 2011
Excuse me, I seem to have soiled myself from laughing so hard.
written by Property Sceptic, December 27, 2011
written by Maz, December 27, 2011
written by Nexus789, December 27, 2011
Other comments have already done a good job of refuting his silliness. Is it April the 1st already?
Plenty of empty houses exist but they are held empty by investors as a result of our perverse tax system.
Yes, Australia may be a big island but it is not isolated from the increasingly unstable global financial system, or the economic stalling performance of China. Since the late 19th Century there have been at least 8 Australian property bubbles and each one was followed by a collapse that clawed back the 'boom'.
I would advise him to take some economics courses but economics is sham also.
written by Don't Prop Up the Ponzi, December 27, 2011
written by Stephen peyer, December 30, 2011
written by Nick1970, January 01, 2012
written by Heard It All Before, March 23, 2012
There might be no one sudden big crash but at best there will be a decade or more of negative growth in inflation adjusted terms.
It's time for the prudent investor to get out of housing and into something (anything!) else.