"All parties are jointly and severally liable for the entire debt, not just for their individual shares."
The six keys to successful joint venturing of property ownership: Chan & Naylor
Page 1 of 2
Property investors’ awareness of creating wealth via add value strategies like renovation, granny flat additions and “knock down and build two” strategies have been fuelled by the plethora of reno shows on TV and the media focus on creation of wealth via property in a relatively flat market.
There seems to be a sense of urgency to “get in and get started” particularly among younger investors who are finding it hard to enter the property market for the first time and even harder to get in if the plan is to renovate or do a small development on the site. For those investors who want to get into the property market sooner rather than later and do not have sufficient savings for a deposit or are short on servicing capacity, joint venturing a deal is coming up more often as an alternative solution.
“Joint venturing” tends to refer to shorter-term arrangements, while “co-ownership” refers to the longer-term holding of property by two or more individuals or entities, be they a couple, friends, family members or trusts.
Three clients of ours successfully recently completed a 14-month investment project and walked away with $43,600 each (pretax!). John, Helen and Marie were each unable to purchase an investment property in their own right, and all wanted to gain firsthand experience doing a small development. They decided to join forces and do a small development that they could on sell quickly. Together they purchased an old weatherboard Queenslander on an 1,100-square-metre residential corner block 12 kilometres from Brisbane CBD. The existing dwelling was at the front of the block and the back of the block had easy street access and room to construct a second dwelling on it. They erected a neat two-storey, four-bedroom dwelling on the back of the block, subdivided it onto two titles, renovated the original Queenslander and landscaped the property with established trees and plantings.
The maths on this is as follows: Purchase: $465,000, council and DA costs: $40,000, build costs: $260,000, renovation costs: $85,000, subdivision costs: $20,000, agent’s fees: $37,000. The renovated Queenslander sold for $570,000 and the new dwelling sold for $610,000. The profit on the venture was $281,000, which they divided between them. After netting out their original $50,000 contributions they had $43,600 each. Each of them will have different capital gains tax liabilities as this depends on their individual financial situations, and so they are off to their Chan & Naylor accountant to clarify this. They are also looking for their next project.
Benefits of joint venturing
Risks of joint venturing