AUSTRALIA'S HOUSING PRICE BUBBLE DEBATE |
|
Categories
People
Companies
|
US analyst Jeremy Grantham adjusts Australian housing price bubble predictions, so watch housing construction numbers now
By
Larry Schlesinger
Australia’s housing bubble will “pop” if it builds more houses, says US hedge fund manager Jeremy Grantham. “If you have a housing bubble and you respond by building houses, it pops. It behaves from a bubble expert’s point of view.” However, Grantham says the RBA’s interest rate cuts are forestalling a property crash. “The UK and Australia are abhorrent bubbles, because of government policy, you draw out the agony,” he told the Australian Financial Review. Grantham, co-founder of Boston-based hedge fund GMO, caused a stir in April 2010 when he declared a housing bubble in Australia and said prices would tumble as interest rate rose (the Reserve Bank pushed rates up by 25 basis points to 4.25% in April 2010). His declaration resulted in a flurry of short-selling by Australian banks. In 2011 Grantham visited Australia and said the housing bubble was about to burst, but later adjusted this forecast to say it might only deflate slowly rather than pop. Grantham correctly predicted Japanese real estate’s bubble in the 1980s, the bursting of the dotcom bubble and the events that led to the US housing crash in 2008. He maintains that an overpriced housing market is not healthy for the economy and puts Australia at a risk of a Japanese-style housing scenario. Under a Japanese scenario those looking to enter the housing market (young first-home buyers) must either continuously save or live outside of the major cities to afford a house. “For someone that hasn’t bought and for a generally healthy economy it’s better to get rid of it and start again,” he says. According to Grantham first-home buyers and new arrivals are better of renting than buying at the moment because house prices are being artificially “propped up. Renting now, he says, is a cheaper and less risky proposition than buying a property. “You are putting a terrible burden on young families, which is a miserable idea,” he says. “Japan did it that way and they have worked it out after 20 years. Back in 1990 if you were young you were looking at loony prices for little shacks in Tokyo.” Backing his argument, Grantham says first-home buyer numbers are at record low ratios in both Australia and the UK. Another US analyst, Heather Hagerty of bond fund manager Fidelity Investments, says the 3.5% fall in house prices in 2011 is “comforting” and says a “healthy correction is going on”. “We take comfort in the fact that the household leverage isn’t growing, that the savings rate continues to be at a high level and the market appears to be reacting to the rate cuts.” However, while Hagerty says the Australian market is shielded by the tax structure, full-recourse lending, low loan-to-value ratios, she agrees with Grantham that pent-up demand is the issue. |
|
|
|














Leave a Comment
written by Dark Knight, February 06, 2012
written by leon, February 07, 2012
written by MIc, February 08, 2012
What about people yet to be born? Have they also missed this mythical boat of home ownership? Seems a tad unfair to mock them for their bad luck.
The whole idea that home ownership is out of reach of anybody who is yet to be in the market is ludicrous and smacks of over leveraged people afraid they have have actually made a massive mistake and fear what dropping property values will do to their supposed wealth.
Honesty, at least think and I mean really think about about what you are describing and tell me if that is really how you want our society to advance. People in slave to debt for longer and longer in order to afford ever increasing property prices?
written by bankjob, February 08, 2012
Are they meant to be strong? What fundamentals are you talking of ? Affordability, intergenerational equity, a booming construction sector,innovation or maybe liveable cities?
Oh no you were just thinking about ROI, wake up, think of the society around you.
written by Stephen Green, February 08, 2012
written by Nexus789, February 08, 2012
When a bubble busts it is because sentiment changes and buyers evaporate as they believe that prices are inflated and will fall. In those circumstances it does not matter how much you think property is worth. People will then chase the price down in a vain attempt to attract a buyer. Bubbles have bust in economies with strong migration, an apparent shortage of housing and with full employment. The inflationary 'value' is an illusion and can evaporate very rapidly with prices trending back to what they were before the bubble. Australia has had 8 housing booms and busts since the late 19th century and the readjustment (there was always one) was between 15% to 40% I believe.
This time round it could be worse as personal debt is so high at 160% of GDP and debt permeates everything and the government has pumped up the bubble via Rudd's stupidity. A reduction in economic activity and unemployment will contribute to the mayhem. The trigger could be a de-leveraging crisis as investors try and off load their portfolios into a falling market. This could be compounded by the corrosive effects of a high dollar, single industry boom (mining) at the expense of other sectors and a rapid slow down in China which is happening as global trade slows.
So there is a bit more to it that meaning words about market fundamentals, etc. I would be planning to manage my finances during the fall rather than living in a state of denial.
written by abc, April 14, 2012