Land Value

Metropolitan Melbourne&#39;s median land price increased by 1% in September to $337,000, up 5% annually, according to Red23, one of the country&#39;s leading land sales agencies.

&quot;This is back to the same median land price achieved in early 2019, but has not reached the peak of $349,000 witnessed in September 2018,&quot; said Terry Portelli, the founder and managing director of Red23.

The latest report noted the median land size continues to decrease, down 0.26% to 387sqm, less than the 400sqm median land size three years ago.

Portelli reckons APRA&rsquo;s increase in the minimum interest rate buffer will have little effect in the short term on the demand for housing in the greenfield areas as demand in these regions remains strong.&nbsp;

&quot;But it will have a negative effect on first home buyers who are already on the backfoot because of swift price increases.&quot;

In September land sold in the Melbourne growth areas have taken approximately 1.5 months to sell from the time it is released to the market; in comparison to 2.6 months in June.

Wyndham sold over 1,200 lots in the third quarter, which is double of the same time last year.&nbsp;

Melton sold close to 1,000 lots in the third quarter, same as 12 months ago.&nbsp;

Casey achieved a similar number to Melton.

In Metropolitan Melbourne, over 4,700 lots were sold in the third quarter, similar numbers to quarter two but and down 990 lots on the first quarter.

The Red23 report noted demand for land remains strong, but stock availability continues to be tight, at record lows of approximately 1,000 lots available at any given time.

Greater Geelong has already sold over 2,000 land lots which is 400 more than the total number sold in 2020.

Regional and semi regional areas remain strong as indicated by the price growth in areas such as Greater Geelong and Mitchell.

Greater Geelong is the biggest mover this month, up 12% to a median land price of $351,000 and an increase of 23% YoY.

Portelli suggest APRA’s increase in the minimum interest rate buffer will have a negative effect on first home buyers 

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Metropolitan Melbourne's median land price heading towards 2018 peak: Red23

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
The continuing question of what return a rural property can demonstrate has been the source of many discussions between valuers, investment managers and accountants involved in financial modelling of rural assets.
Buyer motivation, data access and credibility, commodity and seasonal fluctuations are among the variables that influence a decision about how much someone will pay for an asset.
So while a complex calculation can be built, I asked my research guy Rick, if he could simply overlay the Eastern Young Cattle Indicator (EYCI) and Queensland Cow Market Indicator (QCMI) across the Queensland Grazing Property Index (QGPI) as reported annually by Herron Todd White and see what came up.
The result is per the graphic below and it reveals a very interesting story.
EYCI and QCMI with the QGPI for settled ales over 2,000 hectares
<a href="/images/2016/09/01/Screen%20Shot%202016-09-01%20at%2010.25.55%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/09/01/Screen%20Shot%202016-09-01%20at%2010.25.55%20AM.png" alt="">
For the period 1997 to 2004 the result reflected that  the land values moved in line with, but six months behind the underlying commodity movements with a high conviction.
From 2004 to 2009 however the value of rural land growth to the peak of the market in 2009 was significant with values increasing 62% on the median price in the five years, the ECYI decreasing 15.5% and the QCMI decreasing 10.6%. In other words the driver of land value was not reflective of the commodity return. This disconnect was also highlighted in the QRAA Rural debt surveys in 2009 and 2011.
From 2009 to 2013 the conviction between the land value and commodity return come back into relative alignment, but largely because of the fall in values not the rise in commodity prices.
2014 and 2015 then show the impact of the significant shift in the beef pricing and subsequent impact on land values. The rate of growth in the curve for the EYCI and QCMI is as sharp as at any point in the past 20 years which is no surprise for those in the industry. The jump in land values however is possibly more of a surprise.
So the question then moving forward for all stakeholders is what is the sustainability of the commodity market pricing relative to current sale yard, processor grids and live export pricing? There are potential risks out there (Indian frozen buffalo, Brazil exports etc) that could place a cap on prices and possibly see a reduction in the market place. If this were to occur, the logical view would be that the land values if still following the lag period would adjust accordingly or at least flatten out.
I have recently presented to a few banks and corporate clients and commented that the rapid rise in values in some sense has actually in my mind brought time forward. Where we thought the values may get to in say 2018 have been achieved in 2015 and 2016. The shift has been good for vendors and agents are reporting across the country that it is harder to find or list assets relative to the demand currently. Does the market settle a bit to draw breath or does demand see another level of value shift in land? Only time will tell.
Conclusion: Forecasting the land value movements based on the commodity price overlay which has a six month lag may be a good guide to looking at least into the short term land market values. This assumes the conviction between the commodity outlook and the land values remains high. Of course valuers are not there to forecast or predict the future. They deal with settled sales evidence in a consistent manner of analysis so that our clients have a consistent reference for the conclusions drawn.
The Australian Farm Institute has for its winter edition sought to investigate this question and I was fortunate enough to be asked to contribute to the discussion.
For those interested in reading the five articles from industry and educational institutions, go to the website <a href="https://www.farminstitute.org.au" target="_blank">www.farminstitute.org.au</a> and you can subscribe to the journal. The process of writing this article was good in that it really challenged me to look nationally for information and data to see where the value relationship to land and returns sits based on settled sales over many years. 
Tim Lane the national rural director at HTW and can be contacted <a href="https://www.htw.com.au" target="_blank">here</a>.
 
</body></html>

Rural returns and land values: HTW's Tim Lane

<html><body>
SPONSORED POST
I have a client getting 100 percent average growth and returns on his investment portfolio year on year. He’s a department head of one of Australia’s top four banks. He’s not alone – I have many clients getting plus 100 percent returns year on year.
The question I often get asked is ‘what are they investing in?’ But that would be the wrong question.
The big question is: what do we want property to do for us? 1,973,000 or around 8 percent of all Australians own an investment property.
Only 18.9 percent have two properties, 5.5 percent own three, 2 percent own four and 0.9 percent have six or more. That tells us less than 2 percent of the population are using property to build wealth.
Around 7 million Australians own real estate.
The three main reasons to buy a property are: to live in, for income or for capital growth.
So what do we want an investment property to do for us? Two things: give us income and/or give us growth.
The general rule of thumb is the higher the income the lower the growth (i.e. commercial property) and similarly the higher the growth the lower the income.
So when we buy an investment property we need to be clear about our primary objective: growth or income.
I’m a growth-focused investor. Income is important but growth is the focus. The only part of a property that grows in value is the land. Rule number one for me is 40 percent land content.
So how do you get 100 percent plus per annum figure? The answer is compound growth
98 percent of investors make the biggest mistake you can make – they’re simple investors. They know two questions to ask: ‘what are my returns and when do I get my money back?’
When it comes to property they have one mantra; ‘location, location, location.’ Generally the best location is close to where they live.
Simple investors buy with a view to then sell. Compound investors focus on growth and use this growth for leverage, enabling them to grow their portfolio on their initial investment. Some very important factors then come into play with the strategy. For example the bank you use is vital – you must get a copy of the bank valuation and resist cross-collateralising your own home.
And to top it all off, Australia’s population growth is 1.5 percent-2 percent p.a. Custodian investors have their land bank strategically placed in growth areas where the average population growth rate is over 6 percent p.a. that’s more than three times the Australian average. ‘
Land is the commodity and land is the focus.
John Fitzgerald is CEO of Custodian Group. He founded his company in 1981 and has since bought, sold and developed more than 10,000 properties in 4 states of Australia. He wrote the 7 steps to Wealth in 1998 - now in its 7th edition. Get a copy at <a href="https://www.custodian.com.au/getthebook/" target="_blank">getthebook.com.au</a>.
</body></html>

Invest in land - that is where the growth is: Custodian

<html><body><div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
House price growth accelerated during the March 2015 quarter as turnover fell 5.2% from the previous quarter, marking the third decline for land transactions in three consecutive  quarters.
Housing Industry Association chief economist Harley Dale said the combination of escalating residential land values and a related decline in sales volumes is not a good combination.
"The combination of significantly reduced turnover and strong price growth suggests that supply bottlenecks in residential land are intensifying," Mr Dale said.
"That is pricing new home buyers out of the housing market and capping the construction cycle at a lower level than would otherwise be the case.
According to the quarterly HIA CoreLogic RP Data Residential Land Report the residential land price in Australia increased 4.1% in March when with the previous quarter, up 8.2% from the same quarter last year. The amount of residential land transactions dropped 5.2% and is 17.6% lower than the same quarter last year.
CoreLogic RP Data research director Tim Lawless said the number of vacant land sales peaked over the June 2013 quarter and have since reduced by almost 30," Mr Lawless said.
"To see the price of land consistently rising over the same time frame suggests low supply is the main driver of this price growth rather than a slowdown in demand.
“Higher land prices translate to more expensive housing which is an unfortunate circumstance for those looking to purchase a detached house. Sydney stands out as the most expensive land market with a rate per square metre of $678, followed closely by Perth with a rate per square metre of $664.” 
 
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<a href="/images/2015/07/20/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-20%20at%201.57.38%20PM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/07/20/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-20%20at%201.57.38%20PM.png" alt="" width="812" height="459">
 
<a href="/images/2015/07/20/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-20%20at%201.57.46%20PM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/07/20/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-20%20at%201.57.46%20PM.png" alt="" width="821" height="476">
</div>
</div>
</div>
 
<a href="/images/2015/07/20/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-20%20at%201.57.54%20PM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/07/20/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-20%20at%201.57.54%20PM.png" alt="">
</div>
</div>
</div>
 
 
</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>

mick.cee-iDmgDDAmu8

House price growth up, land turnover still falling: HIA

<html><body>
<div>
On 1 July 2016, Land and Property Information (LPI) will separate into five discrete units which will be integrated into the Department of Finance, Services and Innovation (DFSI) - see organisation chart below. 
<ul>
<li>LPI – Titling and Registry Services</li>
<li>Office of the Registrar General</li>
<li>Spatial Services</li>
<li>Valuation Services</li>
<li>Office of the Valuer General</li>
</ul>
Why we’re changing
LPI was formed around 16 years ago to create a government agency with responsibility for land valuation, land titling and registration and surveying, mapping and spatial information. The division has operated successfully throughout this period and many synergies have been created. 
With advances in technology, many manual processes are now digital and there are channels to ensure continued information sharing between the existing LPI units, without requiring the units to be grouped together as one division. 
With this in mind, as part of a scoping study of LPI, the Government has concluded there is opportunity to provide more benefit to the State if the Titling and Registry Services (TRS), Valuation Services and Spatial Services units of LPI are separated and integrated into DFSI.
Further, the Government has decided to separate the regulatory and operational functions of LPI’s Titling and Registry Services. 
What is changing
The newly formed Office of the Registrar General (ORG) will oversee the operations of LPI - Titling and Registry Services (TRS) and focus on legislative change and policy administration relating to the conveyancing industry. This area will become part of the Better Regulation division, providing for a consistent approach to regulation across government. 
The split of regulatory and operational functions will enable TRS operations to focus on maximising efficiency, customer service and innovation - improving service outcomes for the conveyancing industry. 
Valuation Services will move into Property NSW and will benefit from synergies with the other units within the division that manage property across NSW. Valuation Services will continue to provide services to the Valuer General under a service level agreement. The Office of the Valuer General will remain a separate unit reporting to Parliament and the Secretary, DFSI
Spatial Services will be integrated into Government and Corporate Services to ensure spatial information is provided to other government agencies efficiently, maximising innovation in this rapidly evolving area of technology.
The separation was carefully designed to avoid any increase in complexity and the new model strengthens commercial performance, innovation and regulatory oversight. As part of this, a new <a href="https://www.urban.com.au/property-observer">pricing framework</a> has been introduced.
Land and Property Information changes 2016
</div>
<div>
<a href="/images/2016/06/22/Structural_Changes_2016V3.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/06/22/Structural_Changes_2016V3.jpg" alt=""> 
</div>
<div>
<h2> </h2>
Operational
LPI – Titling and Registry Services
LPI – Titling and Registry Services (TRS) – maintains a secure and efficient system of land ownership and State-Government-guaranteed land title protection (under the Torrens system).
In September 2015, the NSW Treasury launched a comprehensive scoping study to investigate future options for Land Property Information (LPI). 
As announced on 20 May 2016, the Government has decided to offer a long term concession of 35 years for the management of the titling and registry services business of LPI.
You can also read the <a href="https://www.urban.com.au/property-observer" target="_blank">Treasurer’s announcement</a>.
Spatial Services
Spatial Services, on behalf of the Surveyor General, creates and maintains a spatial representation of the State and acts as a ‘single source of truth’ for foundation spatial information and survey infrastructure and services in NSW. It supports the legislative and statutory requirements for the NSW Surveying and Spatial Information Act 2002.
Spatial Services provide leadership to NSW in the production and maintenance of foundation spatial datasets and services by capturing, sourcing, aggregating and quality-assuring information so that government, industry and the community can make informed decisions and create social and economic value.
It also digitises and preserves NSW state records including historic aerial imagery, land titles, plans and state survey records. 
Spatial Services will be part of Government and Corporate Services within DFSI.
Valuation Services
Valuation Services manages the valuation system on behalf of the Valuer General. The Valuer General delegates specific functions to Valuation Services, detailed in a service level agreement. 
Valuation Services: 
<ul>
<li>establishes and manages valuation contracts </li>
<li>monitors the performance of contract valuers </li>
<li>audits and quality assures land values </li>
<li>determines compensation following the compulsory acquisition of land </li>
<li>manages objections and appeals </li>
<li>delivers customer service </li>
</ul>
Valuation Services will be part of Property NSW, within DFSI.
Office of the Valuer General
An independent statutory officer appointed by the Governor of New South Wales, the Valuer General is responsible for: 
<ul>
<li>the valuation of land for rating and taxing </li>
<li>the determination of compensation when land is compulsorily acquired </li>
<li>setting standards and policies for the valuation system which is managed by Valuation Services </li>
<li>monitoring Valuation Services’ management of contract valuers </li>
<li>monitoring the quality of land values and services provided to the community by Valuation Services</li>
<li>providing professional leadership and stewardship to the valuation industry. </li>
</ul>
The Valuer General reports administratively to the Minister for Finance, Services and Property and the Secretary of DFSI.
Regulatory
Office of the Registrar General
The newly formed Office of the Registrar General (ORG) has assumed the regulatory functions of LPI – Titling and Registry Services (TRS). It will oversee the operations of TRS and focus on legislative change and policy administration relating to the conveyancing industry. The ORG will be integrated into Better Regulation in DFSI, providing for a consistent approach to regulation across government.
The Registrar General’s role 
The Registrar General maintains the NSW land titles system, which underpins over $130 billion dollars of economic activity in NSW each year. This includes the creation and maintenance of land titles records evidencing legal ownership and registered interests for land parcels and the examination and registration of plans and documents relating to land within NSW, while ensuring compliance with statutory requirements and protecting the integrity of the State’s cadastre. 
The NSW Government guarantees security of ownership for registered landowners recorded in the NSW land title system, ensuring confidence in the land title system.
 
For more information, <a href="https://www.lpi.nsw.gov.au/" target="_blank">click here</a>.
</div>
</body></html>

jonathanchancellor-7SQnKwU6yx

NSW land, property changes on July 1

<html><body>
The cost of purchasing a plot of land in Melbourne rose 12.4 percent in 2016, buoyed by low interest rates, strong auction clearance rates and population growth, with the trend expected to continue this year.
The latest figures from project marketers red23 add to the strength of the Melbourne property market where house prices surged 15 per cent in 2016 ( CoreLogic), says a recent article in the Australian Financial Review. 
Across the 143 active housing projects tracked by red23, the Melbourne median lot price rose to just under $240,000, though buyers were compensated with slightly bigger blocks of land, with the median lot size rising from 420 to 448 square metres.
Explaining the surge in land prices, Red23's head of research Andrew Perkins was quoted by the AFR as saying, "In 2016, we saw interest rates at an all‐time low, the strongest auction clearance rates since 2009, continued strong population growth, affordability relatively sound in comparison to Sydney and confidence levels stable.
A Melbourne lot is still 40 percent cheaper on average than a Sydney lot. The October HIA-CoreLogic Residential Land Report recorded a Sydney median lot price of $420,000 for a 450 sq m block.
"This suggests that all things being equal, 2017 will be much the same [for price growth]," he added.
Factoring in the cost of building, a new three-bedroom home within 25 kilometres of the Melbourne CBD can still be bought for under $350,000. In Sydney's outer west, a new three-bedroom home will cost around $600,000.
According to red23, lot price growth was strongest in Wyndham in the south-west, home to the more established growth suburbs like Point Cook and Williams Landing, where lot prices soared 28 per cent to $270,000 and weakest at just 3.8 per cent in Hume in the north and Melton in the west.
Strong buyer demand was also a key factor in rising lot prices, with the Victorian Planning Authority reporting a record 22,000 lot sales in the year to September – Melbourne is home to the country's fastest selling housing estate, the 7000-lot Woodlea estate at Rockbank in the west being developed by Mirvac and VIP Properties.
The strong rise in lot prices and record demand for new housing has seen developers pay huge sums of money for land in the outer suburbs.
</body></html>

Melbourne land prices rose in double digits in 2016

<html><body>
The total land value for the Northern Tablelands region has increased over the 12 month period to 1 July 2016 by 9.5 percent from $7.42 billion to $8.13 billion.
Rural properties showed the highest overall increase of approximately 11.4 percent.
Good seasonal conditions together with strong commodity prices for beef and lamb have been the main drivers for strong increases in rural land values in the region.
Inverell LGA showed the strongest increase (20.3 percent), while the lowest growth was experienced in the Walcha LGA (7.9 percent).
A 961 ha mixed farming land at <a href="https://www.realestate.com.au/property-mixed+farming-nsw-inverell-7876718" target="_blank">Inverell</a> (above) has been listed for sale for $3,750,000.
Residential land values increased by 6.2 percent overall.
The highest increases were in the LGAs of Uralla (12.1 percent), Inverell (7.7 percent) and Armidale (7.2 percent), whilst Walcha (-4.9 percent) and Glen Innes (-2.1 percent) showed a decrease in value.
Residential land at Uralla (above) was recently sold for $107,000.
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/02/03/1%20Dumaresq%20Street.jpg" alt="">
Commercial land values across the region generally remained steady.
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/02/03/Screen%20Shot%202017-02-03%20at%2011.33.40%20am.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/02/03/Screen%20Shot%202017-02-03%20at%2011.33.40%20am.jpg" alt="">
The strongest increase occurred in the LGA of Uralla (16.8 percent).
However, commercial land values decreased in the LGAs of Walcha (-5.3 percent) and Glen Innes (-2.4 percent) reflecting lower demand for commercial property in these areas.
Industrial land values for the region have generally remained steady.
The strongest increase was experienced in Uralla (9 percent), with the largest decrease in Walcha (-5 percent).
For more information including interactive online land value summaries for all LGAs and 14 regions covering the state go to 
</body></html>

j.ballantyne1990-6AQqhLzZaK

Land value for rural Northerland Tablelands properties increases by 11.4%: NSW Valuer-General

<html><body>
New land prices in the south-east corner of Queensland have increased nearly 80 percent over the last 10 years, with the average square metre of new land now costing about $523, according to research from property services group Oliver Hume.
The analysis of new land prices from 2006 to 2016 shows the average block of land has shrunk from 632 sqm to 466 sqm, while average prices have increased from $184,000 to $244,000.
The combination of growing prices and shrinking lots means the average price of a square metre of land in the south east has increased from $291 to $523, or 79.7 percent.
Brinton Keath, Oliver Hume Queensland Joint Managing Director said the increase represented some of the strongest returns from any investment class over the last 10 years.
“If you had acquired an average block of land at a new development in 2006 the same block of land now would probably fetch more than $330,000,” he said.
“The large blocks that were being sold back then are extremely rare these days and would probably attract a healthy premium on top of that.”
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/05/16/Screen%20Shot%202017-05-16%20at%2010.17.31%20am.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/05/16/Screen%20Shot%202017-05-16%20at%2010.17.31%20am.jpg" alt="">
Source: Oliver Hume
“As the cost of development has increased over the last 10 years because of things like infrastructure charges, englobo land price increases, construction costs and red and green tape the size of lots have had to come down to maintain affordability.
"There is also increasing demand for smaller blocks which are lower maintenance.
"The research also showed prices for residential land in the south east increased about 6 percent throughout 2016.
"The pace of growth over the last 12 months reflected continued low levels of supply, with limited new land coming on to the market.
“Prices will continue to rise while there is such a shortage of new land coming on to the market.
“Unless governments at all levels can find ways to release more land for sale, prices will continue to rise at above inflation.”
“We expect similar levels of growth in 2017 with the Gold Coast, which is experiencing a major shortfall in new land, set to experience the strongest growth."
</body></html>

South East Queensland new land prices up 80 percent in 10 years

<html><body>
Land valuers from valuation firm Herron Todd White say the second airport for Sydney at Badgerys Creek has been like winning the lottery for those who bought a small block of land.
"It used to just be called poor man's acreage – greyhound trainers and and truck drivers – but really it's been their lottery win," Herron Todd White's Kim Quick was cited as saying by The Australian Financial Review.
According to an estimate by her colleague, Haden Nolan, land prices have easily doubled since the then Abbott government confirmed the location three years ago.
"As soon as that came out the phones started ringing," Nolan said.
"A five acre (two-hectare) holding with a house and shed would have sold for about $1 million in 2014 and I just did a valuation this morning on a place like that and there is nothing under $2 million for that now. Most of those places are now worth $2.5 million.
One smaller land owner about 5 kilometres from where the airport will be, Jason Kennett, is another supporter of the airport but he thinks values are already priced in.
"I don't think you will see any more value unless all the infrastructure comes in," Kennett said. "We do want to realise the value so we would look to develop the land or sell it."
The federal government  recently said it will build Sydney’s second airport after the Sydney Airport Group, which owns the Kingsford Smith airport, pulled out of the project, citing "risks" on monetary return for its investors.
But not everyone is happy with the news of the second airport. Valuers say the expectation of planes flying overhead have made some move further west.
Jackie Kelly, the former Liberal MP, who held the seat of Lindsay for a decade, which covers parts of Badgerys Creek, is irate that the government is paying.
"The government is going to fund this whole thing. I think taxpayers should be screaming their heads off," Kelly was quoted by the AFR as saying.
Another charged question is who will pay for the infrastructure charges and who might get taxed on the increase in value of the land because of the new infrastructure – a concept known as value capture?
The government will unveil the details of the plan in the federal budget.
UDIA national president and member of the federal government's Cities Reference Group Michael Corcoran said the federal government's decision was excellent news because it offered certainty for people to invest. However, he said if the government started taxing property owners and developers it would have negative consequences.
"If the federal and NSW governments think that value capture taxes on new housing can fund a large portion of the cost of the new airport and related infrastructure they are dreaming," Corcoran said.
"Sydney housing is suffering an affordability crisis driven by a lack of supply and taxes that equate to 30 to 40 per cent of the cost of a new home. New home buyers are at breaking point.
"The new airport and related infrastructure will bring benefits to all of Sydney, NSW and Australia and cannot be used as a pot of tax gold, levied only on new home buyers and employers in western Sydney. More levies and charges on this new city will undermine its viability from day one."
Former Labor heavyweight and former secretary of the NSW Labor Council Michael Easson, who is executive chairman of property investor EG Funds Management, was also overwhelmingly supportive of the airport but questioned the opportunity for private investment and said further work needed to be done to make sure growth in real estate and the local economy was achieved.
"I have seen estimates of property values doubling and tripling in the decades ahead," he said, "although it might seem obvious that property values will go up with new infrastructure, nothing is entirely guaranteed".
"The full realisation will take 30 years or more," Easson said. 
"There are many stages ahead, each with the potential to add value to the built environment, the aesthetics of the urban habitat and property values.
He said public-private partnerships were needed, including good opportunities for super funds to invest – and quality architecture, resourceful thinking to make this transformation.
"Obviously this needs to be bi-partisan and it looks like everyone supports the critical infrastructure. But we need the best minds in the country – and beyond – to make Badgerys Creek one of the best places to live in Australia," Easson said.
Mark Perich has lived his entire life over the road from where the federal government has declared it will go it alone and build the new multi-billion dollar Western Sydney Airport at Badgerys Creek.
Perich, who operates dairy company Leppington Pastoral, is one of the big winners from the plan, with about 2000 hectares of farmland in the area that could one day have thousands of houses on it.
"There have been others who have invested in the area over the last five years on the expectation the airport would go ahead and they have benefited from an increase in land values," he said.
"I don't know how much more it's going to go up."
</body></html>

Badgerys Creek airport a boon for local land owners 

<html><body>
The NSW Land and Environment Court has ruled in favour of a garden outlet owner in Sydney’s Haberfield over a valuation dispute between him and the Roads and Maritime Services which acquired the property.
Judge Sheahan ruled that the applicant, Dan Wei Zheng’s claim for market value through his valuer was preferred to the government valuer.
The RMS compulsorily acquired the land owned by Dan Wei Zheng at 269 Parramatta Road, Haberfield on 15 December 2015 for the construction of Stage 1(b) of the NSW government’s WestConnex Motorway M4 East Project, involving the extension and widening of the M4 Motorway from Parramatta to Haberfield. 
The land area is 1,353.2 sqm with a potential floor space area of 2,029.9 sqm (if redeveloped) and contained buildings originally constructed around 1970 for use as a service station, but were used as a warehouse and display area for the sale of stone products such as bench tops, statues and garden features, noted the judge.
Valuers from the two sides, Messrs John Sanidas for the original owner and government valuer Lunney said the direct comparison method should be the primary valuation method.  
Even, adopting the same valuation method, the two experts arrived at two different market valuations being $805,000 apart. 
David Lunney determined market value at $3,755,000 or $1,850 of potential gross floor area. 
Dan Wei Zheng’s case for valuation was determined by Sanidas who found the market value at $4,560,000 or $2,250 of potential gross floor area. 
The valuer-general valued the land for RMS at $3,635,000 or $1,790 of potential gross floor area.
“In general terms, I prefer Sanidas’s evidence to Lunney’s, but I need now to explain my reasons,” said the judge.
When the two experts adopted secondary (or check) valuation method i.e capitalisation of (notional) rent a difference of $1,760,000 was revealed. 
The government valuer determined ($2,500,000) whist Sanidas determined ($4,267,000). 
Sanidas said the close assessments based on the primary and secondary methodologies was largely due, in his view, to competing property market segments. For example, the owner occupier and or investment/development market segment each saw comparable underlying land value.  
The judge noted that “given the disparity between the valuer’s applications of their secondary/check method – capitalisation of (notional) rent – I do not consider it necessary or useful to go into detail, beyond noting that the figure arrived at by Sanidas, when employing this method ($4,267,000) is reasonably comparable to the value at which I have arrived after my analysis of the valuation evidence”.
While the valuers agreed regarding what constituted the highest and best use of the land, as it existed at the date of acquisition, Sanidas said the land had the further advantage of being able to continue indefinitely in a profitable manner. 
The valuer for the RMS submitted that the improvements to the site at the date of acquisition represent a significant underdevelopment, which were at the end of their economic and functional life; albeit nevertheless capable of ongoing use. 
Sanidas said the jurisdiction of the NSW Land and Environment Court allow where a person or business is dissatisfied with the award of compensation determined by the Valuer-General in connection with the compulsory acquisition of land, that person or business is entitled to have that determination reviewed by a judge of the Land and Environment Court, in what is known as ‘Class 3’ of the Court’s jurisdiction.  
Class 3 is unique, because it represents the only forum in which an applicant may go to have their compensation reviewed by a third party. 
The valuers identified the “Bunnings precinct” as a prime retail hub for, particularly, industrial and construction goods. That hub benefitted from exposure to very heavy passing traffic, but there were competing views as to how far from the Bunnings corner along Parramatta Road, the precinct extended to the east (city bound). 
But there was general agreement between the expert valuers as to the number of adjustments to apply to the evidence. The three adjustment factors included:-      
1.The Bunning Precinct - location advantage due to large traffic volumes 
2.Corner advantage - evidence showing premiums paid for corner sites 
3.Monthly market improvement- evidence showing market growth of 1.5% per month or 18% per annum. 
The adjustment — 5% of 15% — to be applied to the evidence was for the court to determine. 
The court’s adjustment ultimately saw a judgement for market value $4,560,000/$2,250 sqm generally in line with Sanidas’ determination of market value. 
</body></html>

Land Value

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Land Value

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News